In re Cato

783 A.2d 723, 170 N.J. 38, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1393
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 16, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 783 A.2d 723 (In re Cato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cato, 783 A.2d 723, 170 N.J. 38, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1393 (N.J. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-223, concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to OLIVER W. CATO of MAPLEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, for violation of RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client) and RPC 5.5 and Rule 1:21-1 (failure to maintain a bona fide office), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for .appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 A.2d 723, 170 N.J. 38, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cato-nj-2001.