In re Cathleen B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cathleen B.

231 A.D.2d 962, 648 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 231 A.D.2d 962 (In re Cathleen B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cathleen B., 231 A.D.2d 962, 648 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record establishes that, despite petitioner’s diligent efforts, respondent failed substantially and continuously to plan for the future of the children (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Although respondent participated in some of the services offered by petitioner, he remained unable to address and overcome the problems that led to the removal of the children (see, Matter of Rebecca D.,222 AD2d 1092; Matter of Sonia H., Ill AD2d 575, 576). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court’s finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence. The record establishes that, despite petitioner’s diligent efforts, respondent failed substantially and continuously to plan for the future of the children (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]). Although respondent participated in some of the services offered by petitioner, he remained unable to address and overcome the problems that led to the removal of the children (see, Matter of Rebecca D.,222 AD2d 1092; Matter of Sonia H., Ill AD2d 575, 576). (Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 962, 648 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cathleen-b-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack