in Re: Catherine Karlseng
Opinion
Order entered February 12, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00049-CV
IN RE CATHERINE KARLSENG, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-08-14206-K
ORDER In accordance with the Court’s opinion issued this date, the petition for writ of
mandamus is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. The Court ORDERS the trial judge, the
Honorable Craig Smith, Judge of the 192nd Judicial District Court, to VACATE his November
25, 2013 “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Designation of Assets (Related to Catherine Karlseng
Received Income) for Turnover to Receiver and Granting Powers and Duties of Receiver.”
Should the trial judge fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. The Court
ORDERS the trial judge to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this
order, a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order.
The Court ORDERS relator, Catherine Karlseng, within ten (10) days of the
date of this order, either to: (1) dismiss her appeal, cause number 05-14-00105-CV, or (2) to
file a letter brief in cause number 05-14-00105-CV of no more than 3 pages explaining how, in light of the Court’s disposition of her petition for writ of mandamus, this Court has jurisdiction
over the appeal in cause number 05-14-00105-CV. If Relator files a jurisdiction letter brief, real
party may file a responsive letter brief of no more than 3 pages within 10 days of relator’s brief.
No extension of time will be granted. If either party will be relying on information not in the
record before this Court that party must obtain a supplemental clerk’s record from the trial court
containing that information. After it has received briefs regarding the jurisdictional issue, the
Court will either: (1) order the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction; or (2) notify the parties
by letter that the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal and, if appropriate, of any pending
deadlines. We caution you that failure to file a jurisdictional brief may result in dismissal of the
appeal without further notice.
We ORDER that relator recover her costs of this original proceeding from real party in
interest.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Catherine Karlseng (in Re: Catherine Karlseng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.