In re Cataline

131 A.3d 408, 224 N.J. 256, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 213
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 2, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 131 A.3d 408 (In re Cataline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cataline, 131 A.3d 408, 224 N.J. 256, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 213 (N.J. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-160, recommending on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20^4(f) (default by respondent), that ANNE P. CATALINE of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since October 8, 2014, be disbarred for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and the principles of In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979);

And ANNE P. CATALINE having failed to appear on the Order directing her to show cause why she should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

[257]*257It is ORDERED that ANNE P. CATALINE be disbarred, effective immediately, and that her name be stricken from the roll of attorneys;

ORDERED that ANNE P. CATALINE be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that ANNE P. CATALINE comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Wilson
409 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 A.3d 408, 224 N.J. 256, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cataline-nj-2016.