In re Cataline

98 A.3d 1191, 219 N.J. 429, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1081
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 2, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A.3d 1191 (In re Cataline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cataline, 98 A.3d 1191, 219 N.J. 429, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1081 (N.J. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-412, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that ANNE P. CATALINE of MARLTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with client), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANNE P. CATALINE is hereby reprimanded; and it is farther

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A.3d 1191, 219 N.J. 429, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 1081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cataline-nj-2014.