In Re Castueras

California Court of Appeal

In Re Castueras

19 P.2d 250, 130 Cal. App. 15, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 972

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 23, 1933

DocketDocket No. 2345.

StatusPublished

This text of 19 P.2d 250 (In Re Castueras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Castueras, 19 P.2d 250, 130 Cal. App. 15, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 972 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

CONREY, P. J., and HOUSER, J.

It appearing from a consideration of the petition for the writ, and from the return to the writ heretofore issued herein, that the complaint filed in the justice’s court did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, and it further appearing that, *16 for the reason above stated, the commitment under which petitioner is held in custody is void, it is ordered that the petitioner be discharged from custody. (Pen. Code, sec. 647, subd. 7.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONREY, P. J., and HOUSER, J.

It appearing from a consideration of the petition for the writ, and from the return to the writ heretofore issued herein, that the complaint filed in the justice’s court did not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense, and it further appearing that, *16 for the reason above stated, the commitment under which petitioner is held in custody is void, it is ordered that the petitioner be discharged from custody. (Pen. Code, sec. 647, subd. 7.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 P.2d 250, 130 Cal. App. 15, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-castueras-calctapp-1933.