In re Castellino

647 A.2d 504
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 13, 1994
DocketNo. 609, Disciplinary Docket; No. 2—Supreme Court; No. 36 DB 88 Disciplinary Board
StatusPublished

This text of 647 A.2d 504 (In re Castellino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Castellino, 647 A.2d 504 (Pa. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 17, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1801, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 A.2d 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-castellino-pa-1994.