In Re Castano v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Castano v. the State of Texas (In Re Castano v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 26, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00151-CV ——————————— IN RE DIANA CASTANO, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Diana Castano, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus
challenging the trial court’s “granting [of] an indefinite plea in abatement,” “fail[ure]
to rule on a motion to dismiss,” and “fail[ure] to grant a Motion to Transfer Venue.”1
1 The underlying case is Manuel Reyes v. Wendy Hernandez, Diana M. Castano, and Alexander Vairas, Cause No. 17-DCV-242799, in the 328th District Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Monica Rawlins presiding. Relator requests that the Court “lift the abatement, dismiss the claims or
transfer . . . venue . . . to Galveston County.”
We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Castano v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-castano-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.