In re Cassandra C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Cassandra C.

216 A.D.2d 294, 627 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D.2d 294 (In re Cassandra C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cassandra C., 216 A.D.2d 294, 627 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In an adoption proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, the natural father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Pach, J.), entered March 2, 1994, which, after a hearing, determined that his consent to his daughter’s adoption by the mother’s new husband was not required.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On this record, it cannot be said that the Family Court erred in concluding that the appellant natural father "evince[d] an intent to forego * * * parental * * * rights and obligations” (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Amanda, 197 AD2d 923; Matter of Stephan Joseph S., 158 AD2d 524; cf., Matter of Corey L. v Martin L., 45 NY2d 383). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an adoption proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, the natural father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Pach, J.), entered March 2, 1994, which, after a hearing, determined that his consent to his daughter’s adoption by the mother’s new husband was not required.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On this record, it cannot be said that the Family Court erred in concluding that the appellant natural father "evince[d] an intent to forego * * * parental * * * rights and obligations” (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Amanda, 197 AD2d 923; Matter of Stephan Joseph S., 158 AD2d 524; cf., Matter of Corey L. v Martin L., 45 NY2d 383). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 294, 627 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cassandra-c-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack