In re Cashio

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cashio

182 So. 3d 939, 2015 La. LEXIS 2521, 2015 WL 8555667

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 30, 2015·No. No. 2015-B-1710·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY .PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Randall J. Cashio, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the Office of Disciplinary Counsel failed to prove the charged misconduct by clear and' convincing evidence.

[940] Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges be and hereby are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY .PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Randall J. Cashio, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the Office of Disciplinary Counsel failed to prove the charged misconduct by clear and' convincing evidence.

[940] Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges be and hereby are dismissed.

In re Cashio, 182 So. 3d 939, 2015 La. LEXIS 2521, 2015 WL 8555667 (La. 2015).

Pincite

182 So. 3d 939 (In re Cashio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.