In re Cashio

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cashio

182 So. 3d 939, 2015 La. LEXIS 2521, 2015 WL 8555667

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 30, 2015

DocketNo. 2015-B-1710

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 3d 939 (In re Cashio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cashio, 182 So. 3d 939, 2015 La. LEXIS 2521, 2015 WL 8555667 (La. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY .PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Randall J. Cashio, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the Office of Disciplinary Counsel failed to prove the charged misconduct by clear and' convincing evidence.

[940]*940Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges be and hereby are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY .PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Randall J. Cashio, seeks review of a ruling of the disciplinary board imposing a public reprimand. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we find the Office of Disciplinary Counsel failed to prove the charged misconduct by clear and' convincing evidence.

[940]*940Accordingly, it is the judgment of this court that the formal charges be and hereby are dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 3d 939, 2015 La. LEXIS 2521, 2015 WL 8555667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cashio-la-2015.