In re Casey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Casey

847 A.2d 659, 577 Pa. 535, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 998

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 25, 2004

DocketNo. 872 DISC 3, C1-03-860, 49129

StatusPublished

This text of 847 A.2d 659 (In re Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Casey, 847 A.2d 659, 577 Pa. 535, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 998 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2004, Patrick M. Casey having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 6, 2003; the said Patrick M. Casey having been directed on November 18, 2003, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the [660]*660identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Patrick M. Casey is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period three months, to run consecutive to the suspension imposed by this Court by Order dated May 8, 2002, at No. 730 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2004, Patrick M. Casey having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated May 6, 2003; the said Patrick M. Casey having been directed on November 18, 2003, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the [660]*660identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is

ORDERED that Patrick M. Casey is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period three months, to run consecutive to the suspension imposed by this Court by Order dated May 8, 2002, at No. 730 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

847 A.2d 659, 577 Pa. 535, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-casey-pa-2004.