In re Casey

797 A.2d 892
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 8, 2002
DocketNo. 730 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 797 A.2d 892 (In re Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Casey, 797 A.2d 892 (Pa. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2002, Patrick M. Casey having been suspended [893]*893from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of three months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated October 29, 2001; that said Patrick M. Casey having been directed on March 5, 2002, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Patrick M. Casey is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
797 A.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-casey-pa-2002.