In re Casey
This text of 221 A.D.2d 528 (In re Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by William F. Hyland and Patrick J. Scinto, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emmanuelli, S.), dated October 13, 1993, and cross appeal by Margaret Patricia Looby and Suzanne Casey Bove from stated portions of the same decree.
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated in the decision of Surrogate Emannuelli dated June 9, 1993. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 528, 634 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-casey-nyappdiv-1995.