In re Casey

221 A.D.2d 528, 634 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D.2d 528 (In re Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Casey, 221 A.D.2d 528, 634 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Appeal by William F. Hyland and Patrick J. Scinto, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Emmanuelli, S.), dated October 13, 1993, and cross appeal by Margaret Patricia Looby and Suzanne Casey Bove from stated portions of the same decree.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated in the decision of Surrogate Emannuelli dated June 9, 1993. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Looby v. Commissioner
1996 T.C. Memo. 207 (U.S. Tax Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D.2d 528, 634 N.Y.S.2d 396, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-casey-nyappdiv-1995.