In re Cases Held for the Decision in In re J.V.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Cases Held for the Decision in In re J.V.

982 N.E.2d 663, 134 Ohio St. 3d 325

DecidedDecember 5, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 982 N.E.2d 663 (In re Cases Held for the Decision in In re J.V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cases Held for the Decision in In re J.V., 982 N.E.2d 663, 134 Ohio St. 3d 325 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The issuance of the mandates in the following cases was held for the decision in In re J.V., 134 Ohio St.3d 1, 2012-Ohio-4961, 979 N.E.2d 1203. The stay of the mandates is lifted, and the causes are remanded for application of State v. Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344, 2011-Ohio-3374, 952 N.E.2d 1108, and In re J.V.

{¶ 2} 2008-1624. In re D.J.S., 3d Dist. No. 10758.

{¶ 3} 2008-1926. In re G.E.S., 9th Dist. No. 24079, 2008-Ohio-4076, 2008 WL 3413040.

{¶ 4} 2008-2257. In re M.D.G., 3d Dist. No. 10811.

{¶ 5} 2009-0189. In re A.R., 5th Dist. No. 08CA17.

{¶ 6} 2009-0223. In re A.R., 12th Dist. No. CA2008-03-036, 2008-Ohio-6566, 2008 WL 5205648.

{¶ 7} 2009-0358. In re S.R.P., 12th Dist. No. CA2007-11-027, 2009-Ohio-11, 2009 WL 18001.

{¶ 8} 2009-0826. In re J.C., 9th Dist. No. 24354, 2009-Ohio-1213, 2009 WL 695440.

{¶ 9} 2011-0325. In re AC., 1st Dist. No. C-100136.

{¶ 10} 2011-0515. In re T.D., 12th Dist. No. CA2010-01-002, 2011-Ohio-671, 2011 WL 497778.

{¶ 11} 2011-1027. In re A.R.R., 194 Ohio App.3d 40, 2011-Ohio-1186, 954 N.E.2d 1213.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI