Home/California Court of Appeal/In re Case

In re Case

54 Cal. App. 2d 36
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedAugust 13, 1942
DocketCrim. No. 3632
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cal. App. 2d 36 (In re Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Case, 54 Cal. App. 2d 36 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This matter came on for hearing upon the writ of habeas corpus issued on the 6th of August, 1942.

Prom the findings and decision on file it appears that the subject has been for some years the ward of Clara Rungie, [37]*37and that on the 28th day of July, 1942, her letters of guardianship were revoked and it was ordered that the custody of the child be restored to his father, Howard L. Case. Inasmuch as such order was self-executing, the father acted in the proper exercise of his duties as the natural guardian in assuming custody of the child. (Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Belcher, 4 Cal. (2d) 268,273 [48 P. (2d) 681].)

The writ is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Belcher
48 P.2d 681 (California Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cal. App. 2d 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-case-calctapp-1942.