In re Case

California Court of Appeal

In re Case

54 Cal. App. 2d 36

California Court of Appeal·Decided August 13, 1942·No. Crim. No. 3632·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

This matter came on for hearing upon the writ of habeas corpus issued on the 6th of August, 1942.

Prom the findings and decision on file it appears that the subject has been for some years the ward of Clara Rungie, [37] and that on the 28th day of July, 1942, her letters of guardianship were revoked and it was ordered that the custody of the child be restored to his father, Howard L. Case. Inasmuch as such order was self-executing, the father acted in the proper exercise of his duties as the natural guardian in assuming custody of the child. (Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Belcher, 4 Cal. (2d) 268,273 [48 P. (2d) 681].)

The writ is therefore discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This matter came on for hearing upon the writ of habeas corpus issued on the 6th of August, 1942.

Prom the findings and decision on file it appears that the subject has been for some years the ward of Clara Rungie, [37] and that on the 28th day of July, 1942, her letters of guardianship were revoked and it was ordered that the custody of the child be restored to his father, Howard L. Case. Inasmuch as such order was self-executing, the father acted in the proper exercise of his duties as the natural guardian in assuming custody of the child. (Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Belcher, 4 Cal. (2d) 268,273 [48 P. (2d) 681].)

The writ is therefore discharged.

In re Case, 54 Cal. App. 2d 36 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

54 Cal. App. 2d 36 (In re Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related