In Re Carter

716 S.E.2d 909, 395 S.C. 128, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 324
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 716 S.E.2d 909 (In Re Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Carter, 716 S.E.2d 909, 395 S.C. 128, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 324 (S.C. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent is a member of the South Carolina Bar and Tennessee Bar. Pursuant to Rule 29(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) provided the Clerk of Court with a certified copy of the Supreme Court of Tennessee’s April 25, 2011, order transferring respondent to disability inactive status in that State. In accordance with Rule 29(b), the Clerk provided the order to ODC and respondent and gave the parties thirty (30) days in which to inform the Court of any reason why respondent should not be transferred to incapacity inactive status in South Carolina. Neither ODC nor respondent filed a response.

Pursuant to Rule 29, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, respondent is hereby transferred to incapacity inactive status.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J. /s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J. /s/ Donald W. Beatty, J. /s/ John W. Kittredge, J. /s/ Kaye G. Hearn, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Dwyer-Jones
24 N.E.3d 566 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
716 S.E.2d 909, 395 S.C. 128, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carter-sc-2011.