In re Carter

357 So. 2d 1175, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3771
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 8, 1978·No. No. 6497·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

This is an appeal from a judgment which found appellant, Mr. Carter, in direct contempt of court as set forth in LSA-C.C.P. art. 222(1). We issued, ex proprio motu, a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed in that a contempt judgment is not a judgment from which an appeal may be taken. The appellant has timely responded to the rule.

We dismiss the appeal.

[1176] As stated by this court in Pasternack v. Lubritz, 280 So.2d 352 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973), “[o]ur jurisprudence is established that a judgment holding one party in a lawsuit in contempt of court is not a judgment from which an appeal may be taken. A litigant’s remedy in such a case is to apply to this Court for supervisory writs.” (citations omitted).

For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is dismissed. All costs of the appeal are assessed to appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carter, 357 So. 2d 1175, 1978 La. App. LEXIS 3771 (La. Ct. App. 1978).

357 So. 2d 1175 (In re Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Succession of Horrell
993 So. 2d 354 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
Smith v. Smith
796 So. 2d 726 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2001)
Taylor v. Johnson
532 So. 2d 557 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Sampson
498 So. 2d 1145 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Goins v. Goins
437 So. 2d 947 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
Le Blanc v. Le Blanc
404 So. 2d 530 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
City of Monroe v. Evans
385 So. 2d 912 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
In re Carter
358 So. 2d 949 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1978)