In re Carter

665 A.2d 991, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 222, 1995 WL 627712
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 26, 1995
DocketNo. 94-FM-403
StatusPublished

This text of 665 A.2d 991 (In re Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Carter, 665 A.2d 991, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 222, 1995 WL 627712 (D.C. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a civilly committed patient confined in the John Howard Pavilion, Ward 9, of Saint Elizabeths Hospital, requested an order of the Superior Court directing his transfer to a less restrictive confinement alternative in the Hospital. Hospital officials opposed the transfer because of what they viewed as a continuing pattern of delusional and dangerous behavior exhibited by appellant. The trial court denied the application.

The role of the court in reviewing such decisions by hospital authorities is limited. It is set forth in decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit binding on this court. Upon our review of the record, including the reports and testimony of Doctors Ganz and Gordon, we agree with the trial court that the hospital authorities “made a permissible and reasonable decision in view of the relevant information and within a broad range of discretion,” Tribby v. Cameron, 126 U.S.App. D.C. 327, 328, 379 F.2d 104, 105 (1967), in concluding that a transfer of appellant from maximum security confinement to a less restrictive alternative was inappropriate at the time in question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
665 A.2d 991, 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 222, 1995 WL 627712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carter-dc-1995.