In re Carter

Fourth Circuit

In re Carter

405 F. App'x 799

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2010·No. No. 10-1787·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yul Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to alter or amend judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to [800]*800act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion on July 1, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Carter’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yul Carter petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to alter or amend judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to [800]*800act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion on July 1, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Carter’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Carter, 405 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

405 F. App'x 799 (In re Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.