In re Carron

535 F. App'x 260
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2013·No. No. 13-1496·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Stephen Carrón petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for issuance of an amended judgment in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court issued the amended judgment on June 6, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently granted Car-ron’s request, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carron, 535 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2013).

535 F. App'x 260 (In re Carron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.