In re Carroll

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Carroll

795 A.2d 848, 171 N.J. 469

DecidedApril 29, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 795 A.2d 848 (In re Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Carroll, 795 A.2d 848, 171 N.J. 469 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision, in DRB 00-395, concluding that RICHARD J. CARROLL of SECAUCUS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1970, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating RPC 1.1 (gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a)(failure to communicate), and RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And RICHARD J. CARROLL having been suspended from the practice of law since January 3,1999, and currently serving a one-year term of suspension effective December 7,2001;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RICHARD J. CARROLL is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective December 7, 2002; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[470]*470ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI