In re Carrier

4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 400, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1925
DocketPatent appeal No. 1706
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 F.2d 1013 (In re Carrier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Carrier, 4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 400, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Opinion

PER OURIAM.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing to allow claims 1 to 8, inclusive, 15, 16, 17, 19; and 20, of appellant’s application for a patent relating to a humidity regulator. After a careful examination of the record and briefs, and giving due consideration to the argument at bar, we are convinced, as were the tribunals of the Patent Office, that the allowance by the office of seven claims of the application protected all the novel features of appellant’s device. For the reasons stated by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Muskat
187 F.2d 626 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 F.2d 1013, 55 App. D.C. 400, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carrier-cadc-1925.