In re Carr-Williams

591 N.E.2d 693, 63 Ohio St. 3d 752, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1321
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 1992·No. No. 91-2406·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s finding that Gail P. Carr-Williams has not established her present eligibility for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also agree with the board’s recommendation. Therefore, Carr-Williams’ application is disapproved, and she may reapply pursuant to the conditions stated by the board.

Order accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carr-Williams, 591 N.E.2d 693, 63 Ohio St. 3d 752, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1321 (Ohio 1992).

591 N.E.2d 693 (In re Carr-Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Manayan
807 N.E.2d 313 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)