In re Carr

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Carr

73 A.3d 1244, 215 N.J. 494, 2013 WL 5288150, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 854

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 18, 2013·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-037, concluding that the formal ethics complaint in Docket No. IV-2010-0025E filed against WARREN H. CARR of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1962, should be dismissed because of the lack of clear and convincing evidence of violation of RPC 1.2(a) and RPC 1.7(a) and (b) and the de minimis nature of the violation of RPC 1.5(b), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the complaint against WARREN H. CARR in Docket No. IV-2010-0025E is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-037, concluding that the formal ethics complaint in Docket No. IV-2010-0025E filed against WARREN H. CARR of WOODBURY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1962, should be dismissed because of the lack of clear and convincing evidence of violation of RPC 1.2(a) and RPC 1.7(a) and (b) and the de minimis nature of the violation of RPC 1.5(b), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the complaint against WARREN H. CARR in Docket No. IV-2010-0025E is hereby dismissed.

In re Carr, 73 A.3d 1244, 215 N.J. 494, 2013 WL 5288150, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 854 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

73 A.3d 1244 (In re Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.