In re Carr

Fourth Circuit

In re Carr

581 F. App'x 261

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2014·No. No. 14-1550·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Carr, 581 F. App'x 261 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

581 F. App'x 261 (In re Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.