In Re Carousel Village Condo's. Inc., Dba Villa Rose Senior Housing RV Park v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued December 16, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

2

Agreement to the . . . City Council, with recommendation for approval, within sixty

(60) days for an up or down vote.”1 Carousel Village further requests attorney’s fees

for breach of contract.

We previously abated this original proceeding until final resolution of the

appeal in appellate case 01-24-01032-CV or further order of this Court. We hereby

lift the abatement and reinstate the original proceeding. We deny the petition. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Morgan and Dokupil.

1 The underlying case is Carousel Village Condo’s, Inc. d/b/a Villa Rose Senior Housing RV Park, Cause No. 2023-83616 in the 152nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Robert Shaffer, then presiding and the Honorable Takasha L. Francis, now presiding.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-25-00030-CV ——————————— IN RE CAROUSEL VILLAGE CONDO’S, INC., D/B/A VILLA ROSE SENIOR HOUSING RV PARK, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Carousel Village Condo’s, Inc. d/b/a Villa Rose Senior Housing RV Park (“Carousel Village”), has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct the trial judge to enforce specific performance of a Rule 11 Agreement. Carousel Village asserts that the trial court erred “by failing to specifically enforce the Rule 11 Agreement and compel the [City of Pasadena’s] Mayor and . . . City Attorney to fulfill the written promise to submit the Rule 11