In Re Carolyn M. Crowley

212 A.3d 827
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 25, 2019
Docket19-BG-368
StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.3d 827 (In Re Carolyn M. Crowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Carolyn M. Crowley, 212 A.3d 827 (D.C. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Florida suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Florida for 91 days; this court's May 3, 2019, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why the functional-equivalent reciprocal discipline of a 91-day suspension with a fitness requirement should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent failed to file a response to the court's show cause order but did file her D.C. Bar R. XI § 14(g) affidavit on May 29, 2019; it is

ORDERED that Carolyn M. Crowley, also known as Carolyn M. Holt, is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of 91 days nunc pro tunc to May 29, 2019, with reinstatement contingent on a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.3d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carolyn-m-crowley-dc-2019.