in Re Carolyn Barnes

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 12, 2013
Docket03-13-00429-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Carolyn Barnes (in Re Carolyn Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Carolyn Barnes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00429-CV

Ex parte Carolyn Barnes

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Carolyn Barnes has filed an original application for writ of habeas corpus in this

Court. In her application, Barnes contends that she “is suffering an unlawful extraterritorial restraint

on her liberty,” having been charged by indictment with a first degree felony, and that “on appeal this

‘conviction’ will be overturned.” Barnes prays that the she be immediately released or, in the

alternative, that this Court reduce the amount of her appellate bond.1

This Court’s original jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus is limited to those

cases in which a person’s liberty is restrained because the person has violated an order, judgment, or

decree entered in a civil case. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833,

835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). Moreover, article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure vests complete jurisdiction over post-conviction relief from final felony convictions in the

1 Article 44.04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows a convicted defendant to seek, in the trial court, reasonable bail pending appeal under certain circumstances. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.04(b). The statute also provides for a separate, preferential appeal for complaints about the trial court’s action in setting bond pending appeal. Id. art. 44.04(g). Here, Barnes has not filed notice of appeal with respect to any trial court order denying her request, if made, to reduce the amount of her bond pending appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider any complaint related to Barnes’s appellate bond in this proceeding. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d

115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 5. Barnes is in

custody pursuant to a felony conviction for aggravated assault. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.02(a)(2).

Accordingly, we dismiss her application for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Filed: July 12, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodson v. State
988 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Carolyn Barnes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carolyn-barnes-texapp-2013.