In Re: Carmine P. Amelio

S.D. New York

In Re: Carmine P. Amelio

DecidedMay 21, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-00314

StatusUnknown

This text of In Re: Carmine P. Amelio (In Re: Carmine P. Amelio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re: Carmine P. Amelio, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

APE, Megs Fe : i ptt et ooo aS © / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ..

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VOID ORDER DATED MAY 18, 2020 DENYING DEBTOR’S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO PARTICIPATE IN ELECTRONIC E- FILING FOR THE ABOVE MATTERS COMES NOW the Appellant-Debtor, Carmine P. Amelio, pro se, who respectfully requests reconsideration of this Court’s void Order dated May 18, 2020, denying debtor’s request for permission to participate in electronic e-filing, for failing to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Judgments in non-jury trials a) In bench trials (trials without jury), the judge not only makes the legal conclusions but also is the finder of fact. b) Written findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in all actions tried without a Jury, whether or not requested by a party. Rule 52(a)(1). c) Findings of fact must be set forth separately from the conclusions of law. (1) Failure to set forth the findings and conclusions separately is likely to be reversible error. Pineda-Lopez v. North Carolina Growers Assoc., Inc., 151 N.C. App. 587, 566 S.E.2d 162 (2002).

Furthermore, although the above matters are closed, Appellant will be filing a motion for stay pending appeal related to the above matters and must first move before the District Court, pursuant to Rule 8: (a) Motion for Stay. (1) Initial Motion in the District Court. A party must ordinarily move first in the district court for the following relief: (A) a stay of the judgment or order of a district court pending appeal; (B) approval of a bond or other security provided to obtain a stay of judgment; or an order suspending, modifying, restoring, or granting an injunction while an appeal is pending.

WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully requests reconsideration of this Court’s void Order dated May 18, 2020 or provide findings of fact and conclusions of law for denying the same, and for all such other relief. oe Date: May 18, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Carmine P. Amelio Carmine P. Amelio, Debtor Pro Se 32 Main Street New Milford, CT 06776 412-612-6774

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REQUEST FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW FOR VOID ORDER DATED MAY 18, 2020 DENYING DEBTOR’S REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO PARTICIPATE IN ELECTRONIC E- FILING FOR THE ABOVE MATTERS COMES NOW the Appellant-Debtor, Carmine P. Amelio, pro se, who respectfully requests reconsideration of this Court’s void Order dated May 18, 2020, denying debtor’s request for permission to participate in electronic e-filing, for failing to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law:

Judgments in non-jury trials a) In bench trials (trials without jury), the judge not only makes the legal conclusions but also is the finder of fact. b) Written findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in all actions tried without a Jury, whether or not requested by a party. Rule 52(a)(1). c) Findings of fact must be set forth separately from the conclusions of law. (1) Failure to set forth the findings and conclusions separately is likely to be reversible error. Pineda-Lopez v. North Carolina Growers Assoc., Inc., 151 N.C. App. 587, 566 S.E.2d 162 (2002).

Furthermore, although the above matters are closed, Appellant will be filing a motion for stay pending appeal related to the above matters and must first move before the District Court, pursuant to Rule 8: (a) Motion for Stay. (1) Initial Motion in the District Court. A party must ordinarily move first in the district court for the following relief: (A) a stay of the judgment or order of a district court pending appeal; (B) approval of a bond or other security provided to obtain a stay of judgment; or an order suspending, modifying, restoring, or granting an injunction while an appeal is pending.

WHEREFORE, Appellant respectfully requests reconsideration of this Court’s void Order dated May 18, 2020 or provide findings of fact and conclusions of law for denying the same, and for all such other relief. oe Date: May 18, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Carmine P. Amelio Carmine P. Amelio, Debtor Pro Se 32 Main Street New Milford, CT 06776 412-612-6774

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

In Re: Carmine P. Amelio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carmine-p-amelio-nysd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack