In re Carmichael

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Carmichael

655 A.2d 72, 139 N.J. 390, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 96

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 24, 1995·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that LEROY CARMICHAEL of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and LEROY CARMICHAEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that LEROY CARMICHAEL of TRENTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and LEROY CARMICHAEL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Carmichael, 655 A.2d 72, 139 N.J. 390, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 96 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

655 A.2d 72 (In re Carmichael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.