in Re Carmen Rincon, Relator
This text of in Re Carmen Rincon, Relator (in Re Carmen Rincon, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00232-CV
IN RE Carmen RINCON, a Child
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 25, 2012
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On April 20, 2012, Relator Carmen Rincon filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and
Motion for Temporary Relief in this court. In her petition, relator asks that we compel
respondent, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, to vacate his February 15, 2012 order denying
relator the right to revoke the Mediated Settlement Agreement. Additionally, her motion for
temporary relief requests that this court stay the trial court’s order pending the outcome of the
mandamus. Relator has not shown that she is entitled to the relief requested, and we deny both
the petition and motion for temporary relief. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004);
see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10-1944-CV, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Alphonso Cantu Rincon and Carmen Yolanda Rincon, pending in the Second 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding. 04-12-00232-CV
Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only if: (1) the trial court clearly
abused its discretion; and (2) the party requesting mandamus relief has no adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v.
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992). Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See
Metzger v. Metzger, No. 01-04-00893-CV, 2007 WL 1633445 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
Jun 07, 2007, pet. denied) (mem. op.); Rodriguez v. Harding, No. 04-02-00093-CV, 2002 WL
31863766 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec 24, 2002, no pet.) (mem. op); Spinks v. Spinks, 939
S.W.2d 229, 229-30 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no writ).
Accordingly, Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carmen Rincon, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carmen-rincon-relator-texapp-2012.