In Re Carmen Astrid Bergeron

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE

9 10 CARMEN ASTRID BERGERON, CASE NO. C24-0929JLR 11 Appellant, ORDER v. 12 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL 13 TRUST COMPANY AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR NEW 14 CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN 15 TRUST 2006-1, 16 Appellee.

17 This matter comes before the court on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy 18 Court for the Western District of Washington. Pro se Appellant Carmen Astrid Bergeron 19 was required to file and serve her opening brief by no later than September 9, 2024. (See 20 Cert. (Dkt. # 9).) To date, Ms. Bergeron has not filed her opening brief on the docket. 21 (See generally Dkt.) Therefore, Ms. Bergeron is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this 22 1 appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) 2 (authorizing dismissal for failure to prosecute); In re Wright, 659 F. App’x 438, 439 (9th

3 Cir. 2016) (affirming dismissal of bankruptcy appeal under Rule 41(b)). Ms. Bergeron 4 shall file her response to this order by no later than September 25, 2024. Alternatively, 5 Ms. Bergeron may discharge this order to show cause by filing and serving her opening 6 brief by no later than September 25, 2024. Ms. Bergeron is warned that failure to 7 respond or otherwise comply with this order may result in the dismissal of her appeal 8 with prejudice.

9 Dated this 11th day of September, 2024. A 10 JAMES L. ROBART 11 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22