In re Carlton-street
This text of 20 Wend. 685 (In re Carlton-street) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
who observed, that on a motion of this kind, the decision of the court on the confirmation of the report would not be reviewed ; that the certiorari being asked for the purpose avowed, it was a matter of course to grant it, the proceeding being in substance the same as drawing up a case in a subordinate court for the purpose of enabling a party to prosecute a writ of error, which this court would require to be done.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Wend. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carlton-street-nysupct-1840.