in Re Carlton Patin
This text of in Re Carlton Patin (in Re Carlton Patin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas April 21, 2016
No. 04-16-00237-CV
IN RE Carlton PATIN
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On April 18, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on April 21, 2016.
_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of April, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016-CI-02194, styled Ex Parte C.J.P., A Child, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carlton Patin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carlton-patin-texapp-2016.