in Re Carlsen Estate
This text of in Re Carlsen Estate (in Re Carlsen Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 24, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161646 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh In re CARLSEN ESTATE. Elizabeth M. Welch, ________________________________________ Justices
MINDY CARLSEN and ALLEN CARLSEN, Co-Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF KINZIE RENEE CARLSEN, Petitioners-Appellants, v SC: 161646 COA: 352026 Van Buren PC: 2012-001118-DE SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN EMERGENCY SERVICES, PC, Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 24, 2021 t0317 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carlsen Estate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carlsen-estate-mich-2021.