in Re: Carlos Espinoza

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 08-10-00136-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ IN RE § No. 08-10-00136-CV

CARLOS ESPINOZA, § An Original Proceeding

§ in Mandamus RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Carlos Espinoza, asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Yahara Gutierrez, Judge of the 65th District Court of El Paso County. To be entitled to mandamus

relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly

abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex.

2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135-36.

Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Relator is entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See TEX .R.APP .P. 52.8(a). Further, we deny Relator’s

motion to stay trial court proceedings. See TEX .R.APP .P. 52.10.

May 5, 2010 DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Carlos Espinoza, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re: Carlos Espinoza (in Re: Carlos Espinoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)