in Re Carl Evans

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2005
Docket04-05-00563-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Carl Evans (in Re Carl Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Carl Evans, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                                                MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-05-00563-CV


IN RE CARL EVANS

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Catherine Stone, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed:   August 24, 2005


PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

            On August 8, 2005, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining of the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice for State’s Failure to Prosecute and his Motion for A Speedy Trial. It is well-settled that a defendant may not use pretrial habeas corpus to obtain the dismissal of criminal charges on speedy trial grounds. Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Ex parte Delbert, 582 S.W.2d 145, 146 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979).

            Also, the petition does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, because relator has failed to provide us with the necessary information by which we may determine the validity of his assertions. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (“Appendix”), 52.7(a) (“Filing by Relator Required”), 52.7(c) (“Service of Record on All Parties”).

            Accordingly, this court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Delbert
582 S.W.2d 145 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Ex Parte Weise
55 S.W.3d 617 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Carl Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carl-evans-texapp-2005.