in Re Carl Evans
This text of in Re Carl Evans (in Re Carl Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00563-CV
IN RE CARL EVANS
Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 24, 2005
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
On August 8, 2005, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, complaining of the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice for State’s Failure to Prosecute and his Motion for A Speedy Trial. It is well-settled that a defendant may not use pretrial habeas corpus to obtain the dismissal of criminal charges on speedy trial grounds. Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Ex parte Delbert, 582 S.W.2d 145, 146 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979).
Also, the petition does not comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52, because relator has failed to provide us with the necessary information by which we may determine the validity of his assertions. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (“Appendix”), 52.7(a) (“Filing by Relator Required”), 52.7(c) (“Service of Record on All Parties”).
Accordingly, this court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition is DENIED. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carl Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carl-evans-texapp-2005.