in Re Carl Craig

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 8, 2022
Docket03-22-00543-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Carl Craig (in Re Carl Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Carl Craig, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00543-CV

In re Carl Craig

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Carl Craig seeks an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his pre-trial

confinement as unlawful. This Court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law

matters; our original jurisdiction to entertain applications for writ of habeas corpus extends

solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d). Our habeas

corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. In re Hall, No. 03-17-00778-CV,

2017 WL 5985541, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 30, 2017, orig. proceeding). Original

jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of Criminal

Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

art. 11.05.

Accordingly, we dismiss Craig’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Filed: September 8, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Carl Craig, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carl-craig-texapp-2022.