in Re Carl Craig
This text of in Re Carl Craig (in Re Carl Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00543-CV
In re Carl Craig
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Carl Craig seeks an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his pre-trial
confinement as unlawful. This Court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law
matters; our original jurisdiction to entertain applications for writ of habeas corpus extends
solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d). Our habeas
corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. In re Hall, No. 03-17-00778-CV,
2017 WL 5985541, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 30, 2017, orig. proceeding). Original
jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of Criminal
Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc.
art. 11.05.
Accordingly, we dismiss Craig’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). __________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith
Filed: September 8, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carl Craig, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carl-craig-texapp-2022.