In re Carey

New York Court of Chancery

In re Carey

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 218

New York Court of Chancery·Decided May 5, 1846·Published

Opinion

Application for an extra allowance of costs, upon the execution of a commission of lunacy, beyond the maximum fixed by the 162d rule. Decided that the expense of getting the solicitor’s bill of costs taxed, in such a case was unnecessary where the solicitor intends to claim over $50; as the court must in every such case examine the bill of costs for itself to see what necessity there is, for any extra allowance. Order allowing the payment of $606, in addition to the $50, but nothing more.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for an extra allowance of costs, upon the execution of a commission of lunacy, beyond the maximum fixed by the 162d rule. Decided that the expense of getting the solicitor’s bill of costs taxed, in such a case was unnecessary where the solicitor intends to claim over $50; as the court must in every such case examine the bill of costs for itself to see what necessity there is, for any extra allowance. Order allowing the payment of $606, in addition to the $50, but nothing more.

In re Carey, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 218 (N.Y. 1846).

Pincite

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13 (In re Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.