In re Carey

New York Court of Chancery

In re Carey

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 218

DecidedMay 5, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13 (In re Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Carey, 6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 218 (N.Y. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Application for an extra allowance of costs, upon the execution of a commission of lunacy, beyond the maximum fixed by the 162d rule. Decided that the expense of getting the solicitor’s bill of costs taxed, in such a case was unnecessary where the solicitor intends to claim over $50; as the court must in every such case examine the bill of costs for itself to see what necessity there is, for any extra allowance. Order allowing the payment of $606, in addition to the $50, but nothing more.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for an extra allowance of costs, upon the execution of a commission of lunacy, beyond the maximum fixed by the 162d rule. Decided that the expense of getting the solicitor’s bill of costs taxed, in such a case was unnecessary where the solicitor intends to claim over $50; as the court must in every such case examine the bill of costs for itself to see what necessity there is, for any extra allowance. Order allowing the payment of $606, in addition to the $50, but nothing more.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 13, 1846 N.Y. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carey-nychanct-1846.