In re Care & Treatment of Threats

468 S.W.3d 466, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 836, 2015 WL 5025163
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 2015·No. No. ED 102124·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Quincy Threats (Appellant) appeals from the probate court’s judgment after a jury trial committing him to secure confinement in the custody of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (DMH) as a sexually violent predator (an SVP). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the probate court did not abuse its discretion in the admission or exclusion of evidence or in instructing the jury. Care and Treatment of Cokes, 183 S.W.3d 281, 285 (Mo.App. W.D.2005); In re Gorman, 371 S.W.3d 100, 105 (Mo.App.E.D.2012). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We [467]*467affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Care & Treatment of Threats, 468 S.W.3d 466, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 836, 2015 WL 5025163 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

468 S.W.3d 466 (In re Care & Treatment of Threats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Care and Treatment of Cokes v. State
183 S.W.3d 281 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
In re Care & Treatment of Gormon
371 S.W.3d 100 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)