In re Care & Treatment of Ramage (Supreme Court)
This text of In re Care & Treatment of Ramage (Supreme Court) (In re Care & Treatment of Ramage (Supreme Court)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
No. 114,562
In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of DONALD E. RAMAGE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in 53 Kan. App. 2d 209, 387 P.3d 853 (2016). Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JOSEPH BRIBIESCA, judge. Opinion filed December 22, 2017. Petition for review improvidently granted.
Sam S. Kepfield, of Hutchinson, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant.
Dwight R. Carswell, assistant solicitor general, argued the cause, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general, was with him on the briefs for appellee.
PER CURIAM: We determine that the petition for review in this case was improvidently granted. This decision is identical in effect to a denial of the petition for review in the first instance, and a "'denial of a petition for review imports no opinion on the merits of the case.'" State v. Eisenhour, 305 Kan. 409, 411, 384 P.3d 426 (2016) (quoting Supreme Court Rule 8.03[g] [2017 Kan. S. Ct. R. 56]).
Petition for review improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re Care & Treatment of Ramage (Supreme Court), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-care-treatment-of-ramage-supreme-court-kan-2017.