in Re: Cardinal Health 109, Inc., Babatunde Oyedian and Maribel Alfaro
This text of in Re: Cardinal Health 109, Inc., Babatunde Oyedian and Maribel Alfaro (in Re: Cardinal Health 109, Inc., Babatunde Oyedian and Maribel Alfaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN RE CARDINAL HEALTH 109, INC., BABATUNDE OYEDIRAN,
and MARIBEL ALFARO
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)
Relators, Cardinal Health 109, Inc., Babatunde Oyediran, and Maribel Alfaro, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus by which they request this Court to direct respondent, the Honorable Daniel T. Robles, Judge of the County Court at Law Number 3 of Cameron County, Texas, to vacate a purported transfer order made on January 2, 2007 and to set aside all orders entered by respondent after the purported transfer. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators has not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
Per Curiam
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
on the 23rd day of March, 2007.
1. See
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Cardinal Health 109, Inc., Babatunde Oyedian and Maribel Alfaro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cardinal-health-109-inc-babatunde-oyedian-an-texapp-2007.