In re Carcione

927 N.E.2d 7, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1434
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2010·No. 2010-0360·Published

Opinion

On April 27, 2010, counsel for applicant filed a motion to seal and a motion for clarification. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would grant the motions. O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ., would grant the motion for clarification.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carcione, 927 N.E.2d 7, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1434 (Ohio 2010).

927 N.E.2d 7 (In re Carcione) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.