In re Caprara
This text of 642 A.2d 1087 (In re Caprara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 1994, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated May 3, 1994, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement. due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
642 A.2d 1087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-caprara-pa-1994.