In re Capodici

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Capodici

727 A.2d 456, 158 N.J. 109, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 463

DecidedApril 7, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 727 A.2d 456 (In re Capodici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Capodici, 727 A.2d 456, 158 N.J. 109, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 463 (N.J. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on January 5,1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOSEPH CAPODICI, formerly of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to refund the sum of $250 to his client Ramon Gadia;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH CAPODICI is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[110]*110ORDERED that within sixty days of the filing date of this Order, respondent shall refund the sum of $250 to his client Ramon Gadia; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI