In re Capizzi
This text of 120 N.E.3d 2 (In re Capizzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*1206{¶ 1} Cedric Douglas has purportedly filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court pursuant to R.C. 2701.03. Mr. Douglas seeks to disqualify Judge Anthony Capizzi from presiding over any further proceedings in the above-referenced child-custody case.
{¶ 2} R.C. 2701.03(A) authorizes a party or a party's counsel in a pending cause to file an affidavit of disqualification. Under Ohio law, an affidavit " 'is a written declaration under oath.' " In re Disqualification of Donnelly ,
{¶ 3} In any event, even if Mr. Douglas had filed an appropriate affidavit, he has failed to set forth sufficient grounds for disqualification.
{¶ 4} Mr. Douglas argues that Judge Capizzi should be removed because he refused to disqualify the magistrate handling the underlying case. "The removal of a magistrate is within the discretion of the judge who referred the matter to the magistrate and should be sought by a motion filed with the trial court." In re Disqualification of Wilson ,
*3{¶ 5} The affidavit of disqualification is denied. The case may proceed before Judge Capizzi.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 N.E.3d 2, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1206, 2018 Ohio 5256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-capizzi-ohio-2018.