In Re Cap Rock Energy Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Cap Rock Energy Corporation

225 S.W.3d 160, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8470, 2005 WL 2595949

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 13, 2005

Docket08-05-00323-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 225 S.W.3d 160 (In Re Cap Rock Energy Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Cap Rock Energy Corporation, 225 S.W.3d 160, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8470, 2005 WL 2595949 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Relator, Cap Rock Energy Corporation, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition against Respondent, the Honorable John Hyde, Judge of the 288th District Court of Midland County based on Respondent’s refusal to dismiss cause number 42,814. A writ of prohibition operates like an injunction issued by a superior court to control, limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 682 (Tex.1989). The purpose of the writ is to enable a superior court to protect and enforce its jurisdiction and judgments. Id. at 688. The writ is typically used to protect the subject matter of an appeal or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and judgments. Id. Based upon the petition and record before us, we conclude that Relator has not established its entitlement to relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice.

Relator, Cap Rock Energy Corporation, asks this Court to issue a writ of prohibition against Respondent, the Honorable John Hyde, Judge of the 288th District Court of Midland County based on Respondent’s refusal to dismiss cause number 42,814. A writ of prohibition operates like an injunction issued by a superior court to control, limit, or prevent action in a court of inferior jurisdiction. Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 767 S.W.2d 680, 682 (Tex.1989). The purpose of the writ is to enable a superior court to protect and enforce its jurisdiction and judgments. Id. at 688. The writ is typically used to protect the subject matter of an appeal or to prohibit an unlawful interference with the enforcement of a superior court’s orders and judgments. Id. Based upon the petition and record before us, we conclude that Relator has not established its entitlement to relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.W.3d 160, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8470, 2005 WL 2595949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cap-rock-energy-corporation-texapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack