In re Cantabene

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Cantabene

227 A.2d 131, 48 N.J. 571, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 285

DecidedMarch 6, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.2d 131 (In re Cantabene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Cantabene, 227 A.2d 131, 48 N.J. 571, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent was charged with converting to his own use monies belonging to a client. There is no question about his guilt. He did, however, make good the shortage, albeit, under the pressure of our order to show cause.

After considering the sundry elements affecting him personally, it is the judgment of the Court that he be suspended for a period of one year. It is so Ordered.

For suspension for one year — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent was charged with converting to his own use monies belonging to a client. There is no question about his guilt. He did, however, make good the shortage, albeit, under the pressure of our order to show cause.

After considering the sundry elements affecting him personally, it is the judgment of the Court that he be suspended for a period of one year. It is so Ordered.

For suspension for one year — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

Opposed — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.2d 131, 48 N.J. 571, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cantabene-nj-1967.