In re Cannon

540 S.E.2d 838, 343 S.C. 211, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 214
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 3, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.E.2d 838 (In re Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cannon, 540 S.E.2d 838, 343 S.C. 211, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 214 (S.C. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel petitions this Court for an order transferring respondent to incapacity inactive status pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 418, SCACR. Respondent consents to the petition.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is transferred to incapacity inactive status until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Teny E. Richardson, Jr., Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other accounts into which respondent may have deposited client or trust monies. Mr. Richardson shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Richardson has authority to make disbursements from respondent’s trust, escrow, and/or operating account(s) as is reasonably necessary and may apply to the Chair of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct for authority to make any disbursements that appear to be unusual or out of the ordinary.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating aceount(s) of respondent, shall serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Terry E. Richardson, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Terry E. Richardson, Jr., Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and [212]*212the authority the direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Richardson’s office.

/s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J. FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
540 S.E.2d 838, 343 S.C. 211, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cannon-sc-2000.