In re Cannizzaro

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cannizzaro

730 So. 2d 872, 1999 La. LEXIS 629, 1999 WL 74256

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 10, 1999·No. No. 99-B-0295·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension Filed By Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel:

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Dale C. Cannizzaro, attorney at law, be immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Louisiana pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19. Said interim suspension is to remain in effect pending further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX.

KNOLL, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

/s/ Walter F. Marcus, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the Joint Petition for Interim Suspension Filed By Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel:

IT IS ORDERED that respondent, Dale C. Cannizzaro, attorney at law, be immediately suspended from the practice of law in the State of Louisiana pursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19. Said interim suspension is to remain in effect pending further orders of this court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that necessary disciplinary proceedings be instituted in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX.

KNOLL, J. not on panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

/s/ Walter F. Marcus, Jr. Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Cannizzaro, 730 So. 2d 872, 1999 La. LEXIS 629, 1999 WL 74256 (La. 1999).

Pincite

730 So. 2d 872 (In re Cannizzaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related